Case Study: 1937 WH Colonial Ductless Retrofit | Biozura

Case Study: AC Retrofit for a 1937 Colonial Revival in West Hartford

This case study documents a 2025 project adding whole-home cooling to a 1937 Colonial Revival in West Hartford's Prospect Hill neighborhood. The home had original hot-water boiler heating but no cooling system; previous summer comfort relied entirely on window AC units and ceiling fans. The homeowners wanted whole-home cooling that preserved their substantial original interior architecture without disrupting plaster walls, hardwood floors, or original built-in cabinetry.

Customer Situation

The homeowners had lived in the 3,200 square foot Colonial Revival for 11 years before deciding to add cooling:

  • Original cooling approach: Six window AC units serving primary living spaces during summer; ceiling fans throughout for air circulation; some rooms uncomfortable during heat waves despite window units.
  • Window AC frustrations: Annual setup/teardown labor; window aesthetics impacted; uneven cooling across home; noise complaints during quiet evening hours; uncertainty about energy use efficiency.
  • Interior preservation priorities: Original plaster walls with picture rails; oak hardwood floors; original built-in china cabinet and library shelving; multi-fireplace interior with original masonry features; substantial interior architectural character valued and protected.
  • Customer preference: Whole-home cooling solution that wouldn't require ductwork through interior walls; willing to invest in premium solution that preserved Colonial Revival character; long-term home retention planned.
  • Heating system: Original 1937 hot-water boiler replaced with modulating condensing boiler in 2018; cast iron radiator distribution preserved.

Diagnostic Visit Findings

March 2025 consultation visit assessed the home and identified cooling solution options:

  • Manual J cooling load calculation: 38,000 BTU/hr (3.2 ton) whole-home cooling load at Hartford 88°F/73°F summer design conditions; load distribution favoring south and west exposures.
  • Distribution evaluation: No existing ductwork; conventional central AC installation would require substantial ductwork through walls, attic, and chases — incompatible with interior preservation priorities.
  • High-velocity small-duct (Unico/SpacePak) evaluation: Feasible but requires 2-inch flex tubing through wall cavities; some interior disruption during installation; supply registers at ceiling locations.
  • Multi-zone ductless mini-split evaluation: Most appropriate for Colonial Revival interior preservation; one outdoor unit serves multiple indoor heads via refrigerant linesets through small wall penetrations.
  • Outdoor unit placement options: Side yard placement appropriate; minimum 24 inches from exterior wall, 10+ feet from neighbor bedroom windows, away from outdoor living area.
  • Electrical service: Existing 200A service adequate for multi-zone ductless system addition; dedicated circuit installation required.

Solution Scope and Equipment Selection

After consultation reviewing options (multi-zone ductless mini-split vs. high-velocity small-duct), homeowners selected multi-zone ductless approach for minimum interior disruption:

Equipment Selected

  • Mitsubishi MXZ-8C48NA outdoor unit: 48,000 BTU/hr cooling capacity (4 ton), variable-speed inverter compressor, supports up to 8 indoor heads. Selected for: capacity headroom over 38,000 BTU/hr Manual J calculation, variable-speed operation for efficient part-load conditions, Mitsubishi Diamond contractor warranty support.
  • 7 indoor heads (zones):
    • Living room (12,000 BTU/hr wall-mounted)
    • Dining room (9,000 BTU/hr wall-mounted)
    • Kitchen (6,000 BTU/hr concealed ceiling cassette)
    • Master bedroom (9,000 BTU/hr wall-mounted)
    • Master bathroom (6,000 BTU/hr concealed ceiling cassette)
    • Bedroom 2 (6,000 BTU/hr wall-mounted)
    • Bedroom 3 (6,000 BTU/hr wall-mounted)
  • Indoor head color selection: All wall-mounted units in white finish coordinating with original wall trim; concealed ceiling cassettes in kitchen and master bathroom integrate into ceiling plane.
  • Refrigerant lineset routing: Linesets routed through attic space and basement to minimize interior penetrations; only points of interior visibility are indoor head locations themselves.
  • Wall-mount control units: Mitsubishi MA Touch wireless controls for each zone; convenient bedroom-level control without integrated thermostats on walls.
  • Centralized control option: Mitsubishi kumo cloud system for app-based monitoring and control; allows homeowners to adjust zones from anywhere with internet connectivity.

Installation Process

Project completed May 2025 over 5 working days:

  • Day 1: Outdoor unit pad preparation and equipment placement; basement-level refrigerant lineset routing through utility chases; electrical disconnect installation; dedicated 240V circuit run.
  • Day 2: Indoor head mounting in 5 rooms (living, dining, master, bedroom 2, bedroom 3); refrigerant lineset routing through attic and walls to each location; condensate drainage routing.
  • Day 3: Concealed ceiling cassette installation in kitchen and master bathroom; substantial ceiling work coordination; condensate pump installation for ceiling cassettes.
  • Day 4: All refrigerant lineset connections; pressure testing for leak verification; system vacuum and refrigerant charge.
  • Day 5: Commissioning including operation verification at all zones; wall control configuration; kumo cloud app integration with homeowner devices; customer walkthrough and operating instruction.

Results

Project commissioned May 30, 2025. First full summer operation 2025 results:

  • Whole-home cooling achieved: All 7 zones reach setpoint reliably during 88°F+ outdoor conditions; significant comfort improvement vs. previous window AC arrangement.
  • Individual zone control: Each room maintains independent setpoint; bedrooms can run cooler than main floor for sleeping; unused rooms can be set to higher setpoint or off entirely.
  • Energy efficiency: Estimated 35-40% reduction in cooling-season electrical use vs. previous 6-unit window AC arrangement; full-summer measurement pending winter electrical bill comparison.
  • Acoustic improvement: Indoor units operate quietly (37-42 dBA per zone); outdoor unit operates at 53 dBA (vs. 65-72 dBA for previous window units); substantial neighborhood acoustic improvement.
  • Interior preservation: Window AC units removed and stored; window views restored; substantial visual improvement from removal of bulky window units.
  • Customer satisfaction: Homeowners report whole-home comfort improvement with no compromise to original architectural character.

Investment Summary

  • Mitsubishi MXZ-8C48NA outdoor unit: $6,400
  • 7 indoor heads (varied capacity and configuration): $9,800
  • Refrigerant linesets, insulation, and fittings: $1,840
  • Electrical disconnect, dedicated 240V circuit, miscellaneous electrical: $1,200
  • Installation labor (5 days, 2 technicians): $7,200
  • Permit and inspection coordination: $320
  • Outdoor unit pad and condensate management: $480
  • Total project cost: $27,240
  • Eversource rebate (multi-zone ductless eligible): −$1,400
  • Federal IRA tax credit: −$2,000
  • Net customer investment: $23,840

Lessons Applicable to Other Pre-WWII Homes

  • Multi-zone ductless preserves historic interiors best: For pre-WWII homes with substantial original architecture, ductless mini-split installations minimize interior disruption; refrigerant linesets through small wall penetrations vs. ductwork through walls, ceilings, and chases.
  • Concealed ceiling cassettes blend better than wall-mounted in some spaces: Kitchens and bathrooms benefit from ceiling cassettes that integrate into ceiling plane; living spaces and bedrooms typically use wall-mounted units.
  • Variable-speed inverter compressors essential: Multi-zone systems with variable-speed compressors handle the varied load conditions of different zones operating at different times; single-speed equipment substantially less appropriate.
  • Outdoor unit placement coordination matters: Side yard placement away from outdoor living areas and neighbor properties; vegetation screening preserved or added during installation.
  • Eversource rebates substantial for multi-zone ductless: Multi-zone systems receive larger rebates than single-zone; combined with federal IRA tax credits, net cost reduced 10-15% vs. unrebated equivalent.
  • App-based control valued by modern customers: Smart home integration (kumo cloud, similar systems) increasingly expected; coordinate during installation rather than retrofit later.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does multi-zone ductless compare to conventional central AC for pre-WWII homes?
Substantially different installation approach. (1) Conventional central AC: requires ductwork through walls, attic, and ceiling chases; supplies and returns require register grilles in walls or ceilings; installation typically requires substantial interior disruption in homes without existing ductwork. (2) Multi-zone ductless: one outdoor unit serves multiple indoor heads via refrigerant linesets; linesets route through small wall penetrations or attic spaces; indoor heads mount on walls or in ceilings at distinct locations. For pre-WWII homes with substantial original architecture, ductless typically preserves interior character better while providing equivalent or superior comfort control. Cost: ductless typically 15-25% higher than conventional AC of similar capacity, but installation labor and interior repair often less, making total cost similar or sometimes lower.
What's the difference between wall-mounted and concealed ceiling cassette indoor heads?
Both serve same function (deliver conditioned air) but differ in installation and appearance. (1) Wall-mounted: rectangular unit mounted high on interior wall; visible component approximately 32-38 inches wide; supply air discharged downward and across room; quieter than older window AC equipment but louder than concealed cassettes. (2) Concealed ceiling cassette: rectangular unit mounted in ceiling plane; only the supply grille visible from below; requires above-ceiling space for the unit body (typically 8-12 inches); quieter operation (concealed motor); aesthetically less visible. Selection depends on: ceiling space availability (cassettes require space; sometimes infeasible in homes without unfinished attic or accessible ceiling chase); aesthetic priorities (cassettes preserve visual character better); cost (cassettes more expensive due to installation labor); zone-specific needs. We typically recommend cassettes for kitchens, bathrooms, and visual-priority spaces; wall-mounted for bedrooms and family spaces.
How disruptive is multi-zone ductless installation?
Modest disruption, far less than ductwork installation. Specific impacts during installation: (1) Outdoor work: outdoor pad construction, outdoor unit placement, exterior wall penetration for refrigerant lineset entry — minimal interior disruption. (2) Interior work per zone: wall penetration where indoor head mounts (typically 3-inch diameter hole for refrigerant lineset and condensate drain); mounting bracket installation; lineset routing through wall and to attic or basement. Each zone takes typically 2-4 hours of interior work. (3) Concealed ceiling cassettes: require above-ceiling access; ceiling drywall penetration; condensate pump installation. (4) Electrical work: dedicated 240V circuit from electrical panel to outdoor unit; control wiring to indoor heads (typically integrated with refrigerant linesets). Most installation work doesn't require homeowner displacement; some rooms inaccessible for short periods during equipment installation. Total disruption: typically 5-10 days for whole-home multi-zone installation.
What kind of energy savings can I expect vs. window AC units?
Substantial savings typical when replacing multiple window AC units with multi-zone ductless system. Reasons: (1) Efficiency: modern ductless equipment SEER 18-26 typical vs. window AC SEER 9-12 (more than double); same cooling for half or less electricity. (2) Variable-speed operation: ductless inverter compressors modulate to match load; window AC cycles on/off producing efficiency losses. (3) Zone control: cooling only spaces in use rather than whole-home with window units running constantly. (4) Reduced infiltration: window AC units cause air infiltration around units; properly installed ductless preserves building envelope. Specific savings depend on cooling consumption: typical 35-50% reduction in cooling-season electrical use is common; sometimes higher when zone control eliminates substantial unused-space cooling. For this case study, preliminary estimates suggest 35-40% reduction; final measurement pending full summer-to-summer comparison.
Could I add heating to this kind of system later?
Yes — multi-zone ductless systems provide both heating and cooling capability. Cold-climate models (Mitsubishi Hyper-Heat, Daikin Aurora) operate effectively to −5°F+, well within Hartford's 4°F winter design temperature. Adding heating to this case study's system: outdoor and indoor equipment already supports heat pump operation; commissioning includes heat mode verification; no equipment changes needed. Operational considerations: (1) Existing boiler remains primary heat source; ductless provides supplementary heating during shoulder seasons (spring, fall) when boiler operation inefficient. (2) Energy economics: heat pump electricity vs. gas boiler heating — depends on rates; typically gas slightly cheaper than electric at current rates, but heat pump efficient during mild weather. (3) Some customers use ductless heat for individual room comfort (cooler upstairs bedroom for sleeping with main heat at lower setpoint); other customers use boiler for primary heat and ductless only for cooling. The system supports either pattern.

Contact Biozura Heating and Air

For multi-zone ductless mini-split installation projects in pre-WWII West Hartford homes, contact us for consultation. Tomás Reyes leads ductless installations (Mitsubishi Diamond contractor, Daikin Comfort Pro certified). Connecticut DCP Unlimited HVAC License #S1-0414829.

  • Emergency Line (24/7): (860) 955-4428
  • Address: 10 N Main St #377, West Hartford, CT 06107
  • Email: info@biozuraheatingairconditioning.xyz
  • Connecticut DCP Unlimited HVAC License: #S1-0414829
  • EPA Section 608 Universal: #608U-2010-447831 (Tomás Reyes)
  • Eversource Participating Contractor: #CT-EVS-22-04612

Contact Us →

Office Hours

  • Emergency Service: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
  • Office Staff: Monday – Saturday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM
  • Closed: Sundays and State/Federal Holidays (emergency line always active)