Case Study: 1925 New Britain AC Retrofit | Biozura

Case Study: High-Velocity Small-Duct AC Retrofit for a 1925 New Britain Colonial Revival

This case study documents a 2025 project adding whole-home central cooling to a 1925 Colonial Revival in New Britain's West End neighborhood. The home had original hot-water boiler heating but no cooling system; the homeowners wanted whole-home cooling that preserved their substantial original interior architecture while providing traditional supply registers throughout rather than visible ductless indoor units. The project used SpacePak high-velocity small-duct technology to route 2-inch flex tubing through wall cavities and ceiling chases.

Customer Situation

The homeowners had lived in the 2,800 square foot Colonial Revival for 16 years before deciding to add cooling:

  • Original cooling approach: Window AC units in 4 primary rooms during summer; oscillating fans in other spaces; uncomfortable second-floor bedrooms during heat waves; no cooling in finished basement office.
  • Aesthetic priorities: Strong preference for traditional supply registers rather than visible ductless wall units; homeowners didn't want any visible cooling equipment in primary living spaces; preserved early-20th-century Colonial Revival character important.
  • Interior features to preserve: Original oak hardwood floors throughout; plaster walls with picture rails and crown molding; original built-in shelving in library; ornate plaster ceiling medallion in dining room; tile fireplace surrounds in living room and library.
  • Heating system: 2019 modulating condensing boiler with cast iron radiator distribution; 18 radiators across 3 floors; preserved and working well.
  • Customer preference: Whole-home cooling solution with traditional appearance; willing to invest premium for solution matching architectural character; long-term home retention planned.
  • Initial consultation: Customer specifically requested high-velocity small-duct system after researching options; previous neighbor installation in similar 1920s home provided positive reference.

Diagnostic Visit and System Design

April 2025 consultation visit and system design:

  • Manual J cooling load calculation: 33,000 BTU/hr (2.75 ton) whole-home cooling load at Hartford 88°F/73°F summer design; load distribution favoring west and south exposures.
  • System selection: SpacePak SPS Series small-duct high-velocity system; 36,000 BTU/hr nominal cooling capacity (3 ton); R-410A refrigerant; matched to home load with reasonable margin.
  • Indoor unit placement: Air handler placement in third-floor attic space; access via existing attic stairs; sufficient clearance for installation and future service.
  • Outdoor unit placement: Side yard location away from primary outdoor living areas; 30 inches from exterior wall; vegetation screening preserved with placement coordination.
  • Distribution design: Route 2-inch flex tubing supply runs through wall cavities, closet chases, and accessible ceiling spaces; 14 supply outlets total throughout home; return air centrally located.
  • Wall and ceiling access: Identified access points minimizing visual disruption; some closet ceiling penetrations; supply outlets in inconspicuous locations.
  • Electrical service: Existing 200A service adequate; dedicated 240V circuit required for outdoor unit and air handler.
  • Refrigerant lineset routing: Through attic from outdoor unit to indoor air handler; standard lineset run.

Solution Scope and Equipment Selection

Equipment Selected

  • SpacePak SPS Series 3-ton outdoor condenser: R-410A refrigerant, variable-speed inverter compressor; SEER2 18.5 efficiency rating; matched to indoor air handler.
  • SpacePak SPS Series air handler: Mounted in third-floor attic; ECM blower motor; designed for high-velocity small-duct distribution; integrated supplementary electric heating coil for future heat pump conversion capability.
  • 2-inch flex tubing distribution: Sound-attenuating insulated flex tubing routed through wall cavities and ceiling chases; small diameter allows routing through spaces conventional ductwork cannot reach.
  • 14 supply outlets total: 5-inch round supply outlets at ceiling locations in primary living spaces; 4-inch outlets in smaller spaces; outlets located inconspicuously in corners or near walls to minimize visual impact.
  • Central return air: Wall-mounted return grille in upstairs hallway; routes to air handler via ceiling chase.
  • Honeywell programmable thermostat: Mounted in centrally-located hallway; provides whole-home temperature control.
  • Condensate drainage: From air handler through attic to existing plumbing; coordinates with bathroom drain stack.
  • Filter housing: Filter access point in attic adjacent to air handler; standard pleated filter (changes every 2-3 months).

Installation Process

Project completed June 2025 over 5 working days:

  • Day 1: Outdoor unit pad preparation and equipment placement; electrical disconnect installation; dedicated 240V circuit run.
  • Day 2: Attic preparation; air handler placement and mounting; condensate drainage installation; structural supports and vibration isolation.
  • Day 3: Refrigerant lineset routing from outdoor unit through attic to indoor air handler; pressure testing for leak verification.
  • Day 4: Distribution flex tubing installation through wall cavities and ceiling chases; supply outlet cutting and installation at 14 locations.
  • Day 5: System fill and refrigerant charging; commissioning with airflow verification at all supply outlets; thermostat installation and configuration; customer walkthrough and operating instruction.

Results

Project commissioned June 30, 2025. First full summer 2025 results:

  • Whole-home cooling achieved: All living spaces reach setpoint reliably during 88°F+ outdoor conditions; substantial comfort improvement vs. previous window AC arrangement.
  • Aesthetic outcome: Traditional supply outlets at ceiling locations; no visible indoor cooling equipment in primary living spaces; preserved Colonial Revival interior character.
  • Even temperature distribution: High-velocity small-duct produces more even temperature distribution than typical residential AC; small-diameter tubing creates higher air velocity from outlets, improving mixing.
  • Quiet operation: Indoor air handler operates at low audible level (44 dBA at supply outlets); outdoor unit operates at 56 dBA; substantial acoustic improvement vs. previous window AC arrangement.
  • Cooling-season energy use: Estimated $480 cooling-season electrical cost for summer 2025 (vs. estimated $640-$720 with previous 4-unit window AC arrangement); 30-40% reduction.
  • Customer satisfaction: Homeowners report substantial comfort improvement with no compromise to interior architectural character; “best home improvement we've done” feedback.

Investment Summary

  • SpacePak SPS Series 3-ton outdoor condenser: $5,200
  • SpacePak SPS Series air handler with supplementary heating coil: $4,800
  • 2-inch insulated flex tubing distribution materials: $1,840
  • 14 supply outlets and return grille: $1,640
  • Refrigerant linesets, insulation, fittings: $840
  • Electrical work (dedicated 240V circuit, disconnect): $1,240
  • Honeywell programmable thermostat: $285
  • Installation labor (5 days, 2 technicians): $7,400
  • Permit and inspection coordination: $320
  • Outdoor pad and miscellaneous: $440
  • Total project cost: $24,005
  • Eversource rebate (high-efficiency AC eligible): −$450
  • Net customer investment: $23,555

Lessons Applicable to Other Pre-WWII Homes

  • High-velocity small-duct preserves traditional appearance: For homeowners specifically wanting traditional supply registers rather than ductless wall units, high-velocity systems provide hidden distribution with conventional outlet appearance.
  • 2-inch flex tubing accesses spaces conventional ductwork cannot: Smaller diameter allows routing through wall cavities, closet chases, and ceiling spaces where conventional ductwork doesn't fit.
  • Cost premium over ductless or conventional AC: High-velocity systems typically cost 15-25% more than equivalent ductless capacity; cost reflects specialized equipment, tubing, and installation labor.
  • Aesthetic priority justifies premium cost for some customers: Homeowners with strong architectural preservation priorities frequently choose high-velocity systems; cost reflects priority rather than necessary inefficiency.
  • Even temperature distribution benefit: Small-diameter high-velocity outlets produce excellent room mixing; sometimes better even temperatures than conventional 6-8 inch supply registers.
  • Supply outlet placement matters: Inconspicuous outlet placement in corners or near walls minimizes visual impact; coordinate with homeowner during design phase.
  • Future heat pump conversion possible: Including supplementary heating coil in air handler allows future heat pump conversion; provides flexibility for electrification path.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between high-velocity small-duct and ductless mini-split systems?
Substantially different approaches. (1) Visible equipment: ductless has wall-mounted or ceiling cassette indoor heads visible in each conditioned room; high-velocity has only small supply outlets (4-5 inch round) at ceiling locations — no visible indoor units. (2) Distribution: ductless uses individual refrigerant linesets to each indoor head; high-velocity uses single air handler distributing through 2-inch flex tubing to supply outlets. (3) Control: ductless provides individual room control per zone; high-velocity provides whole-home control via single thermostat (zoning possible but adds complexity). (4) Cost: high-velocity typically 15-25% more expensive than ductless for equivalent capacity. (5) Aesthetics: high-velocity preserves traditional supply register appearance; ductless has visible modern indoor equipment. (6) Installation: high-velocity simpler conceptually (single air handler) but requires routing access for flex tubing; ductless requires individual indoor head locations and routing. Choice depends on customer aesthetic priorities, budget, and zoning needs.
How does the SpacePak system differ from conventional central AC?
Several key differences. (1) Distribution: SpacePak uses 2-inch insulated flex tubing vs. conventional 6-12 inch rigid metal ductwork; allows routing through smaller spaces. (2) Supply outlets: SpacePak uses 4-5 inch round outlets vs. conventional 4×10 or 6×14 inch rectangular registers. (3) Velocity: SpacePak supplies air at higher velocity from smaller outlets vs. conventional lower-velocity larger registers; both achieve similar room temperature outcomes through different mixing patterns. (4) Sound: high-velocity outlets sometimes more audible than conventional registers; modern systems include sound-attenuating tubing reducing this concern. (5) Installation: SpacePak typically easier to install in retrofit applications where conventional ductwork can't fit; conventional easier in new construction or open ceiling configurations. (6) Equipment: SpacePak uses specialized equipment optimized for high-velocity operation; conventional uses standard residential AC equipment. (7) Cost: SpacePak typically 30-50% more expensive than equivalent conventional central AC; the premium reflects specialized equipment and installation. Best fit: retrofit applications in pre-WWII homes without existing ductwork where aesthetic priorities favor traditional supply outlets.
Can high-velocity small-duct systems be added to homes with hot-water boiler heat?
Yes, this is one of their primary applications. Common scenario: pre-WWII home with hot-water boiler heating and no cooling; homeowner wants central AC without disrupting boiler system. (1) Independent systems: high-velocity AC operates entirely independently of existing boiler; air handler in attic or basement, distribution through walls/ceilings, no interaction with hydronic system. (2) Preservation of boiler: existing hot-water boiler and radiator distribution untouched; HVAC modernization happens through completely separate AC system. (3) Sometimes combined: if home plans future electrification, high-velocity air handler with electric heating coil could provide both cooling and supplementary heating; boiler retained as primary heat for severe cold. (4) Distribution coordination: existing radiator distribution doesn't interfere with high-velocity tubing; both systems operate independently. This case study's home had recent (2019) modulating condensing boiler that was preserved entirely; high-velocity AC added as completely separate system.
What's the installation timeline for high-velocity small-duct AC?
Variable based on home size and complexity; typical 3-7 days for whole-home installation. This case study's 5-day timeline typical for 2,800 sq ft Colonial Revival. Factors affecting timeline: (1) Home size: larger homes with more supply outlets take longer; small homes (1,500-2,000 sq ft) sometimes 3-4 days. (2) Access challenges: homes with finished basements, multiple floor levels, or limited attic access take longer than easily-accessed installations. (3) Outlet count: more supply outlets requires more individual installation time. (4) Distribution complexity: routing through challenging spaces (walls without easy access, around obstructions) takes more time. (5) Concurrent work: combining with other home improvement (electrical work, renovation) sometimes extends timeline. (6) Customer involvement: customer preferences about supply outlet placement may require iterative consultation during installation. Most projects complete within 5-7 days; rarely exceed 10 days even for complex installations.
How does cooling-season energy use compare to conventional AC?
Similar to conventional variable-speed AC of equivalent SEER rating. SpacePak Variable-speed inverter equipment SEER2 18.5 vs. conventional residential AC SEER2 ratings ranging 13.4 to 26 depending on equipment tier. Operating cost factors: (1) Equipment SEER: higher SEER = lower operating cost for equivalent cooling. (2) Variable-speed operation: modulates capacity to match load; better part-load efficiency than single-stage. (3) Distribution losses: small-duct systems have similar distribution efficiency to well-designed conventional ductwork; sometimes better than poorly-designed conventional systems. (4) Right-sizing: high-velocity equipment available in narrow capacity range (typically 2.5-5 ton); right-sizing important for efficiency. (5) Operating pattern: customer behavior affects operating cost as much as equipment selection. For this case study, projected $480 cooling-season cost represents typical performance for the equipment tier and home characteristics.

Contact Biozura Heating and Air

For high-velocity small-duct AC installation in pre-WWII New Britain and surrounding area homes, contact us for consultation. Connecticut DCP Unlimited HVAC License #S1-0414829.

  • Emergency Line (24/7): (860) 955-4428
  • Address: 10 N Main St #377, West Hartford, CT 06107
  • Email: info@biozuraheatingairconditioning.xyz
  • Connecticut DCP Unlimited HVAC License: #S1-0414829
  • EPA Section 608 Universal: #608U-2010-447831 (Tomás Reyes)
  • Eversource Participating Contractor: #CT-EVS-22-04612

Contact Us →

Office Hours

  • Emergency Service: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
  • Office Staff: Monday – Saturday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM
  • Closed: Sundays and State/Federal Holidays (emergency line always active)